Good luck trying to emulate a dumbass, dumbass.
-
Wouldn't even know where to find a left handed screw driver
My favorite is having the new guy hold a bucket behind someone else using a grinder, to collect sparks for the spark plugs.
So nonsensical and yet so many people fall for it.
-
The only thing hindering AI from taking 99% of the jobs is that robotic engineers still can't create a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands.
We should have an AI design a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands!
-
i'd like to see ai measure something 3 times and get 4 different numbers
The furure is now.
-
Can AI shit post on Lemmy while pretending to work? Didn't think so.
You don't pay be to be busy 100% of the time, you pay be to be 100% busy sometimes.
-
The furure is now.
if it gets me a kitten asleep on my lap i'll take it
-
This post did not contain any content.
I can see AI measuring something 3 times and cutting it wrong, more than I can see AI measuring things once and cutting it right.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hey, why don't you try cutting your dimensional lumber with a gas-powered chainsaw and be more accurate, eh?
-
This post did not contain any content.
The bandaged eye sells the joke beautifully.
-
The only thing hindering AI from taking 99% of the jobs is that robotic engineers still can't create a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands.
Realistically, most jobs don't NEED hands. Most physical jobs can be done better with customized manipulators for the type of work being done.
We'd only need hands if we wanted a single robot model that could do multiple types of jobs, instead of a specific robot for each job.
-
The only thing hindering AI from taking 99% of the jobs is that robotic engineers still can't create a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands.
I mean, I would add to this list:
- Humans are way cheaper to recruit, maintain, and produce. Robots only compete on their potential for sociopathicly blind loyalty.
- Computers are deeply fucking stupid in ways that most normal humans cannot even understand, until something tragic happens directly to them, as a reuslt. (And no, AI hasn't fixed this. It put a really cool looking coat of razor thin paint over it.)
-
They will measure it wrong 3 times, cut it wrong while saying it’s correct.
Are we talking about the AI or the contractor?
Both. Technically all three.
- The general purpose AI unsuited to the task.
- The untrained contractor directing the AI.
- The soulless profit-bot AI that manages the contractor.
-
Hey, why don't you try cutting your dimensional lumber with a gas-powered chainsaw and be more accurate, eh?
That looks like a concrete saw to be honest.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Have you seen AI with numbers? It doesn’t calculate, it just trying to give a statistically-likely answer (just like it does for every other next-word in its answer).
Some of them have to drop back to deterministic software tools (and even then sometimes they’re called with incorrect parameters because “intent” lol)
AI already emulates dumbasses it just got no legs. Don’t worry though, soon they’ll give it legs and guns. Nothing can go wrong guys. trust me bro the future is now
-
I mean, I would add to this list:
- Humans are way cheaper to recruit, maintain, and produce. Robots only compete on their potential for sociopathicly blind loyalty.
- Computers are deeply fucking stupid in ways that most normal humans cannot even understand, until something tragic happens directly to them, as a reuslt. (And no, AI hasn't fixed this. It put a really cool looking coat of razor thin paint over it.)
Counterpoint. Robots build cars almost entirely on their own.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I think AI might end up being more successful in the low-complexity trades (e.g., install a disposal) than for high-complexity white-collar work. The robots just take time to develop.
-
I think AI might end up being more successful in the low-complexity trades (e.g., install a disposal) than for high-complexity white-collar work. The robots just take time to develop.
On the other hand, complex white- and blue-collar work do not seem very close
-
I think AI might end up being more successful in the low-complexity trades (e.g., install a disposal) than for high-complexity white-collar work. The robots just take time to develop.
A white collar example where AI is effective: Make the button this specific shade of blue and move it 3 pixels to the left
-
This post did not contain any content.
Measure twice, cut once and we still find a way to mess it up
-
This post did not contain any content.
Meanwhile ChatGPT setting a timer:
-
This post did not contain any content.
AI does it five times, in my experience.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Εγγραφή Σύνδεση