‘She’s opening the bees!’ US beekeeper jailed for trying to save friend from eviction | Massachusetts woman set swarms of insects on sheriff’s deputies attempting to evict elderly man with cancer
-
It's a crime to "brandish" a firearm because police can't accept others having the same powers they do.
It's cause the lot of them are pussies. Personally I think very illegal and dubiously ethical things should be done to these pissants, the reason it's dubiously ethical is because I don't know how many people would be chill with human sacrifices to a one eyed god.
-
What's that? A deputy is coming to evict an old cancer patient? A large influx of bees ought to put a stop to that!
-
This post did not contain any content.
That no one has posted either the Oprah gif or the Tommy Boy clip is extraordinarily disappointing
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
There's a reason people carry rifles to protests...
It's normal carry, it's not brandishing
If only open carry were legal in all 50 states
-
This post did not contain any content.
“This was unlike anything our team has ever experienced,” Nick Cocchi, the Hampden county sheriff, said of the incident, which was captured on video released by his office and posted to YouTube by MassLive.
Oh, so let me get this straight:
Six months of jail time for weaponizing apian assault on badge-wearing servants of capital, but absolutely zero consequences for the systemic, routine devastation of booting an 80-year-old cancer patient out of his house so some predatory lending vulture can liquidate his assets.
The sheriff found the bee incident “unlike anything our team has ever experienced.” Yeah buddy, because you experience housing destruction so fucking regularly it doesn’t even register as anomalous anymore. It’s background radiation at this point. Just another Tuesday enforcing the financial rape of sick people.
“We try to help people through difficult situations,” Cocchi said, while literally being the instrument of their most difficult situation. That’s some real I’m very sorry for this but I’m going to do it anyway energy. “We’re compassionate genocidalists” is basically what you’re saying.
Rebecca Woods showed up with an actual physical manifestation of “NO” and the state’s response was to break her face into pavement and jail her for six months. But the eviction? Chef’s kiss. Totally cool, totally legal, totally normal.
The fact that his statement treats getting swarmed by bees as the shocking aberration rather than, I dunno, the routine judicial destruction of someone’s life is just peak American law enforcement tunnel vision. You know what’s “unprecedented”? Actually giving a shit about the person you’re destroying.
Woods failed, the guy lost his home, and everyone’s fine with that. That’s the part that should be “unlike anything we’ve experienced.“FUCK THESE PIGS
FUCK THIS SYSTEM
STING ALL THE FUCKING PIGS
-
So, why are the public authorities involved in private evictions at all?
BTW:
The court heard that Woods was told during the encounter that some deputies were allergic to bees, and that she replied: “Oh, you’re allergic? Good!”



Because police protect capital, not citizens.
-
She got 6 months but will only do 2 more weeks because she was held without bail.
America is the toilet of jurisprudence.
The incident happened in 2022 and it's only now that she got convicted? Is that what America calls "the right to a speedy trial"?
-
90 years ago when the sherrif showed up to evict people like this...
The neighbors were already there with shotguns.
If the sherrif didn't turn around, the county was soon having to vote for a new sherrif. And they usually voted for one that wouldnt even leave their office for an eviction call.
If anything ever went to trial out of it, juries were very unlikely to convict.
Sometimes people need to just stop giving any fucks. And we're kind of getting there again...
Same thing would happen when a black person would try to move into a white neighborhood
-
The incident happened in 2022 and it's only now that she got convicted? Is that what America calls "the right to a speedy trial"?
You have the right to a speedy trial, but most people do not invoke it because you want your lawyer to build a defense. You can waive a lot of stuff, including the right to a trial by jury itself, and just go right in front of a judge if you want, but he's almost certainly going to find you guilty.
-
So, why are the public authorities involved in private evictions at all?
BTW:
The court heard that Woods was told during the encounter that some deputies were allergic to bees, and that she replied: “Oh, you’re allergic? Good!”



You want landlords evicting people themselves???
-
This post did not contain any content.
This sounds like a teaser for the next Beekeeper movie.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
90 years ago when the sherrif showed up to evict people like this...
The neighbors were already there with shotguns.
If the sherrif didn't turn around, the county was soon having to vote for a new sherrif. And they usually voted for one that wouldnt even leave their office for an eviction call.
If anything ever went to trial out of it, juries were very unlikely to convict.
Sometimes people need to just stop giving any fucks. And we're kind of getting there again...
Saw your username, then read your comment, and now I'm not sure what to do with my Fucks.
-
Saw your username, then read your comment, and now I'm not sure what to do with my Fucks.
Schrödinger's Fucks
-
Because police protect capital, not citizens.
Yeah, but the alternative now is a private sector dedicated to forcibly removing people from places. I agree with your sentiment, I personally think cops need to be reminded of the fact they're civil servants, but I also don't want private security conducting evictions.
-
You want landlords evicting people themselves???
Αυτή η δημοσίευση έχει διαγραφεί! -
This post did not contain any content.
shes like that QUEEN BEE" character in supergirl series.
bees
-
Yeah, but the alternative now is a private sector dedicated to forcibly removing people from places. I agree with your sentiment, I personally think cops need to be reminded of the fact they're civil servants, but I also don't want private security conducting evictions.
I do, let them appear as the hostile occupying force that they are. They shouldn’t get to hide behind taxpayer money and force to conduct their theft.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Εγγραφή Σύνδεση


